Foodshed Planet Picks (borrow or buy used first)

See all 54 of my book recommendations here.

Friday, July 11, 2008

In Terms of a Collective Debate


When I first read about the book, The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupifies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future, written by Mark Bauerlein, a professor at Emory University, I thought it sounded like a perfect complement to Last Child in the Woods, the book I loved so much last summer by Richard Louv. Last Child in the Woods maintains that one of the big reasons that children are losing their connection with nature is because of their increased obsession with, and reliance on, computers and technology. As a result, many negative things are occurring, including their loss of a "360-degree awareness" of the physical world.

After reading The Dumbest Generation, I would add that this obsession, specifically with computer-based social marketing (which studies show "dumbs down" teenager's vocabulary and virtually eliminates time spent reading books), results in a dramatic drop-off of 360-degree intellectual awareness. According to research Bauerlein cites, the current coming-of-age generation has severe limitations in their knowledge of history, literature, art, civics, philosophy and politics. He is particularly concerned that this lack of any cultural or historical perspective is producing citizens ill-equipped to lead a democracy.

I called Professor Bauerlein to discuss this book in more detail. I was particularly interested in knowing if the new generation represents a paradigm shift that might, in fact, be good for our country. Perhaps faster, more elastic ways of thinking might provide this generation with a new surge of innovation (I'm a fan of fresh thinking). Professor Bauerlein indicated that research is not showing the positive effects that were predicted of computer use on student achievement. However, he considers culture wars to be a good thing for a democracy, with some people holding fast to the past and others advocating for change, leading to a balance.

"We need a plurality of opinions," he told me, "so that ideologies don't become too fixed. People should always think in terms of a collective debate."

The ability to have that collective debate, however, is being threatened. And why is revealed in what I consider to be the best part of this book. There's a whole section about the "Incidence of Rare Words" in various media. Apparently, there is a list of the 10,000 most common English words. Any word not on that list is considered rare. Various media expose readers or viewers to a certain number of rare words per 1000. The more rare words you encounter, the more your vocabularly grows. The fewer rare words, the more your vocabulary stagnates, and the less likely you are to engage with material that challenges you--an endless cycle.

Get this--adult TV has fewer rare words per 1000 than children's books. And kids, teens, and young adults are not reading. Some enormous percentage of them read nothing for pleasure in the last year. Not even a magazine article. In short, the more you allow your vocabulary to stagnate, the less likely you are to experience a plurality of opinions. And that, according to Bauerlein, leads to complacency.

And, let's face it, complacency is probably not a good thing for a democracy. And a language deficit that prevents our youngest adult citizens from being able to engage in a complicated discussion about issues of importance for our country is clearly an emerging problem.

Professor Bauerlein told me that, in the last twenty years of teaching, the big thing he has noticed is a major drop-off in vocabulary, not surprisingly, but also an increased inability for students to memorize things such as poetry. Today's students have a severely limited ability to recall information, perhaps because of their growing dependence on quick computer searches for facts-at-their-fingertips, and, in all fairness, probably also because of our country's current educational focus on short-term recall of facts that can be measured on a standardized test rather than on long-term learning and intellectual development.

Interestingly, just after finishing The Dumbest Generation, I saw that the current issue of The Atlantic has a cover article titled "Has Google Made Us Stoopid?" which adds a whole other level of discussion to this topic (and, for the record, The Atlantic has many, many "rare words" in it!)

And, before young adult readers of FoodShed Planet lambaste me, even though I'm a solid twenty years older than the age-range to which Bauerlein refers in this book, I (a relatively heavy computer user) plead guilty about some of the things he claims are problems with the younger generation. For instance, I found the book a little slow. I kept wanting sidebars, shorter chapters, bullets, wrap-ups at the end of chapters, things like that. It also took me forever to get through the book. Yes, I kept taking breaks to check my email, my Technorati score, my Feedburner and Adsense stats. Is that bad? Debatable.

After reading this book, I think it is time to add a few items to our list of Things Kids Need to Learn in Life (remember when we started that back in early May? This ever-expanding list has been influenced by numerous reader comments!):

* How to grow your own food (and how to store it)
* How to ride a bike
* How to swim
* How to take care of where you live
* General etiquette/manners (and awareness of how it differs across cultures)
* How to access resources (physical resources as well as information)
* Basic "earth skill" survival knowledge
* Basic self defense
* Basic car maintenance
* How to use a variety of tools
* How to earn, manage, invest and share money
* How to recognize and follow your passion
* How to navigate a mass transit system
* How government works, and what influences it, both now and historically
* How to be a good citizen
* How to continually challenge yourself to broaden your mind and not settle for complacency
* The first-hand experience of volunteering
* How to sit still for two hours and read a book
* How to ask questions and not just give answers
* The pride and joy of memorizing a beloved poem. My personal fave is The Road Not Taken, by Robert Frost, especially since I memorized it while hiking in the woods.


Any other thoughts on this list?

9 comments:

sproutingbroccoli said...

Well, I'm 23 and I recognise a lot of these things, but can proudly say that with the exception of basic car maintenance (which I can be excused cos I don't drive, I feel!) I can do everything on your list to some degree! One thing I've noticed is that now I have permanent broadband, Facebook etc, I actually spend less of my time actively communicating with people (other than friends nearby) than back when we had to ring them or write letters, or at least when the internet was so slow and expensive that you'd log on maybe three times a week to check your email and have to email everybody you wanted during that hour, for example.

I think I might have called the book 'How Badly Adapting to the Digital Age Stupifies Young Americans etc' though. I think it's about good parenting and good education and teaching children about balance. Just cos a mobile phone is useful doesn't mean you have to have it with you or turned on all the time, and just cos you can have instant access to so much information doesn't mean you have to be incapable of sitting in a library reading a book for research, say. And now I noticed that thing about Facebook and internet, I make more effort to write letters and ring people for a chat. It's about using these things as tools rather than letting them use you and I do notice a big difference in my peers between those of us who have recognised this and those of us who haven't (mostly people a bit younger than me tbh... we didn't get internet, mobile phones etc till my mid/late teens so I still remember life without it, but my younger brother barely does).

Renee Unplugged - said...

WOW!
That was close to home.
I've been recognising the diminished attention span in myself over the past year or so now.
I can still sit/lie down with a good novel for the hours or days that it takes to read it.
However, with any meaty subject matter, I'm looking for the bullet points, sidebars, & synopsies, or I simply skim the material.
That is especially true when surfing through the internet.
If an article is too long I skim or stop reading and move on to the next quick thing.
The Atlantic article that you posted the link to was WAY too long for my current attention span. I had to keep fighting the urge to skim it all the way to the bottom. It was a constant struggle and that makes me very concerned.
I have a side question for you.
At what age did you start reading "chapter" books to your kids? My boys are 5 and 3 1/2 and we read daily, usually at bedtime. But we still read shorter childrens books - we haven't jumped to books requiring continuation on another night yet...

Pattie said...

Hannah (Sprouting Broccoli): You said it best--"It's about using these things as tools rather than letting them use you."

And Renee, I wouldn't worry too much about your short attention span while you still have young kids!

As for reading, I started reading classic children's novels to my kids at your kids' ages. The Black Stallion. Swiss Family Robinson. Dr. Doolittle. The Secret Garden. I tended toward classic novels that had movies made about them so that we could follow up the book with a viewing. They loved that.

Sometimes I would leave parts out or edit a bit as I went along if something seemed inappropriate. Many days, we would only make it through a couple pages, but we'd keep it going. We acted things out a lot, if I recall.

By the time they were both in kindergarten, they were reading chapter books on their own. As for personal reading choices, they have both gravitated towards classics, although their tastes are different. They both ADORE Jane Austen, however--a writer with whom I simply never connected! Lately, we've been watching all the Jane Austen adaptations from Masterpiece, which are really excellent, although I have missed the ending of probably every one because I zonk out.

I also always let them see me reading books, and made it clear that there were certain times in the day when you curl up with a book. Now, none of us fight over the computer (although we all use it quite a bit), but we do call dibs on the hammock!

Christy said...

I started reading chapter books to my son when he was 4. We started with the Magic Treehouse books, which he loved at that age. He's 8 now and I read Harry Potter and the like to him. Starting chapter books at a young age I think really helped with his attention span and reading comprehension.

Tameson O'Brien said...

Wow. I feel just the opposite. I read more, a LOT more, and more deeply now than ever before. That article from the Atlantic was a real pleasure to read and I read it all not looking for sidebars, and frankly I think if it had had side bars I would have continued to read the article and then returned for the sidebar info afterwards. I do that with internet pages and magazines as well. Speaking of magazines I have noticed I've become more impatient with them lately and with exceptional few, Time, Discover, Spin-off, and Piecework, Mother Earth News and the Herb companion, I have mostly given up on magazines as real reading - more of a half hour diversion. If I have $7.00 to spend I'd rather get a used book than a magazine, and it'll take me a week to get through it. In the late 80s it took me a week to get through a magazine. I read to give my eyes and brain something to entertain themselves while my hands are busy knitting (I use a book weight to keep books open, and the computer screen is the optimal reading tool). Perhaps this is why I read thouroghly, I'm in it for the long haul, I seek out lengthy articles and books. I don't click the sidebars and hyperlinks because that would mean pausing the knitting, and I don't want to do that. It slows me down, and I enjoy it more, and get more from it. Do you remember the old saying "chew, chew, chew, it tastes better when you do" ? It's kind of like that. Maybe what you really need to do is slow down and read things more mindfully. Perhaps then you'll be more fulfilled with the experience.

Pattie said...

Tames; That whole knitting-while-reading thing is an amazing skill!

But I agree with you on many of the magazines--they have gotten so, so content-light that they are simply not worth the money anymore.

Pattie said...

Whoops--that was supposed to say "Tameson"

Anonymous said...

I've just discovered your blog (via your January post on Victory Gardens). It is wonderful :-) I'm sorry this post is anonymous, but Blogger never seems to know who I am. *sigh* My name is Tina :-)

There's a Robert Heinlein quote that I have kept/used for many years. It's one of my top 10 favorite quotes of all time:
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects."
Robert A. Heinlein

The man is still relevant! :-)

Tina

Renee Unplugged - said...

Thanks for the responses!
Renee

Some of my published stuff

Some of my published stuff
Editors, email me at sustainablepattie@comcast.net if you think I would be a good fit for your national publication.